I want to try to break the monopoly on the interpretation of Donetsk media causes that contributed to the emergence of "ticketing scandal". And to that end will hold its journalistic investigation, the logic described below. My suggestions do not claim to irrefutable conclusions, because they are not backed up by specific documents. However, I believe that self-respecting fans, who always and for any reason prefer to have your own, and not imposed by someone else opinion, pay attention to the plausibility of these hypotheses. So, the version number 1, according to which Akhmetov in peak Surkis deliberately organized antireklamnuyu campaign around Ukraine vs Greece. His sudden revelation about tickets to the FIM for the

"exorbitant price" were received by local fans as a signal - do not buy, and wait will drop. Most people believe their patron and obediently endured until recently, believing that the FFU did allow the president of FC Shakhtar to do charity work through the budget of the federation. What came of it, is already known. Akhmetov - satisfied with the "pure" PR, mess with the reputation of the President of FFU. A provoked populist statements Donetsk club's fans instead of the promised discounts and tickets to 20 hryvnia have a link on its website, where they offered free popinat Surkis for "zhlobstvo" and dismisses him. Concerning the outcome of the match Ukraine-Greece, he did not have any relation to the inspired "ticket scandal. Attempt Donetsk media contrary to logic and soccer practice to prove the equation in which the account in the game purports to directly depend on the number of spectators in the stands, looks extremely naive and amateurishly. It is well known that the 12-th player can not solve the problem instead of playing team on the field. His moral and psychological support - this is just an additional, but not the decisive factor of victory. And in any case not vice versa, as some try to convince. Therefore, Donetsk interpretation of a causal link between the prices of tickets, unsuccessful performance of our team and peremptory accusations against FFU does not convey a perfect logical picture. It lacks too much critically important puzzles that can be so easy to believe in the sincerity of the authors of this propagandistic paintings. According to my second version, "Donbass-Arena" and could not be in this day is filled to capacity. After all, the government announced its decision to quarantine nine regions of the country. A ban on public events spread all throughout Ukraine, including and Donetsk. Because our people are generally very easy to panic, the daily TV news with the subjects of dozens of victims of the "swine flu" was enough to discourage the mass of the citizens of any interest in visiting places of large gatherings of people. Streets, shops, markets, railway stations, theaters in many cities immediately emptied, on motorways, even disappeared "cork". It is therefore not surprising that few fans ventured to spend two hours in thousands Bowl stadium. It is, moreover, that each of them received free gauze bandage on the input. As a result, the psychological factor of fear of infection, was more powerful argument in favor of the TV than a patriotic duty to support the blue-yellow personal presence in the stands. By the way, not least played here and the availability of transmission resonance of the match, which was held at the First National TV Channel. It is noteworthy that the Donetsk media, unwinding hysteria "ticketing scandal, for some reason never thought on the directives of the Government on the safety measures during the quarantine. Is it that then they would not have to hang all the dogs on the FFU and to incite Surkis group of offended fans? This fact gives me a good reason for believing that the situation "Donbass Arena" has been a gross manipulation of public opinion, in which its directors cynical silence about the real emergencies, real impact on the insufficient number of filled seats during the match. In the same version of the falls and the assumption of active participation in this conspiracy against the FFU by officials of the Premier League and the curator of MNP from FC Shakhtar. In view of the inlet on their initiative, the standoff between the National Association and 11 th PL clubs, it is possible that professional clubs loyal to Danilov and Safiullin were encouraged to show concern for the health of the local fans, who decided to go to Donetsk to match the national team. In this If the organizers of this "information campaign" has not hesitated to appeal to government regulation, and are strongly stressed the inadmissibility of his neglect. Thus, Akhmetov, a potent mass-media cover Danilov and Safiullin, which under the guise of Donetsk media actively engaged in sabotaging the proper organization and conduct of the country responsible for the match. Home and unwavering goal - "the dirty" Surkis personally discredit FFU in the eyes of millions of fans, UEFA and FIFA, to organize the chaos and division in football country's economy, then to declare the complete failure of the current leadership of the federation to hold in their hands the reigns of government. These attempts are not new, but because every time it is very easy to read by praising the behavior of so-called football opposition. And finally, the version number 3. It was evident when it was already on the eve of the match Ukraine-Greece on the information scene suddenly appeared a group of prominent politicians with their obsessive fans of advice - make the right choice between the "greedy" Surkis and "generous" Akhmetov. It got even before that the head of the Donetsk campaign headquarters of a presidential candidate publicly called the owner "Donbass Arena" - Peter the Great, with all the historical parallels ... These undeniable facts point to the involvement of the creation of "ticketing scandal" political consultants that serve the presidential election campaign in Ukraine. On the eve of the new presidential election there is heavy traffic and the people's deputies, who use high electoral activity in the community for self-rating and raise the profile of political parties they represent. It's no secret that one of the most popular political technologies, which are used in a power struggle, it is considered - the creation of his chief opponent, the image of the treacherous enemy. In the history of the "transcendental prices" from the FIM "positive hero" Akhmetov Surkis immediately pinned the label " unscrupulous "," greedy "," inhuman "and deaf to the needs of ordinary poor citizens official. The terminology is followed by massively replicated the Donetsk media biased describing this "horrible misconduct" head FFU must be gradually distort the present public face Surkis, making him angry and unattractive to most people. Thus, the "slit scandal" Akhmetov had planned to kill two birds with one stone on the political and football fields. In conclusion, I again repeat that none of the proposed version does not claim to ultimate truth. They only seek to increase the angle of view on the "ticket scandal, artificially narrowed the Donetsk media to one single interpretation. Let all who read these lines, he determined on the reliability of the proposed ideas.